Memphis Grizzlies vs Chicago Bulls Prediction & Betting Pick

⸻START OUTPUT——

NBA: Memphis, Grizzlies, +124 vs Chicago, Bulls, -148 NBA Preseason Friday, October 9, 2026 Total Handle: N/A — no published preseason handle or applicable preseason default

Overall Verdict: NO PLAYS

• Model Winner: Memphis Grizzlies (54.7%)
• Projected Score: Memphis 117, Chicago 116
• Projected Total: 233.1
• Market Total: 239.5
• Best Spread Lean: Grizzlies +3.5 (-115), 64.2%
• Best Moneyline Lean: Grizzlies +124, 54.7%
• Best Total Lean: Under 239.5 (-110), 63.0%
• Decision: All three fail the model’s maximum 4-percentage-point method-sensitivity requirement.
• Model estimates are marked with * throughout. Unmarked statistics and market prices are sourced from the supplied analysis.

⸻

Game Details:

• Time: 5:00 PM PDT (8:00 PM ET)
• Location: United Center, Chicago, Illinois
• TV: NBA TV (national); DAZN Grizzlies stream (listed in team release, not independently reverified for this game)
• Event: NBA Preseason
• Memphis Preseason Record: 1-1
• Chicago Preseason Record: 1-0
• Odds Source: DraftKings, approximately 5:55 AM PDT
• Moneyline: Grizzlies +124 / Bulls -148
• Spread: Grizzlies +3.5 (-115) / Bulls -3.5 (-105)
• Total: 239.5 (-110 both sides)
• Opening Line: Chicago -3.5 (-110), Chicago ML -155 / Memphis +130

⸻

Team Lineups

RotoWire projected starting lineups for October 9, 2026. Not confirmed. Statistical averages are from the 2025–26 NBA regular season unless otherwise indicated.

No Seed Memphis Grizzlies 13th Western Conference, 25-57 Overall, 1-1 Preseason

• PG: Ty Jerome (19.7 PPG, 5.7 APG, 32.7 USG%) — 15 NBA games in 2025–26
• SG: Cedric Coward (13.6 PPG, 5.9 RPG, 54.2% eFG)
• SF: Jaylen Wells (12.5 PPG, 0.9 SPG, 55.9% TS)
• PF: Cameron Boozer (22.5 PPG, 10.2 RPG, 13.2% OREB) — NCAA Duke statistics, not NBA
• C: Zach Edey (13.6 PPG, 11.1 RPG, 1.9 BPG, 30.6% DREB) — 11 NBA games in 2025–26
• Key Bench: Jerami Grant (18.6 PPG, 15.4 PER), Cam Spencer (11.1 PPG, 17.2% USG)

Lineup Notes:

• Cameron Boozer has started both preseason games.
• Ty Jerome started both games at point guard.
• Scotty Pippen Jr. has come off the bench.
• Edey made his preseason debut October 7, playing 10 minutes.
• Estimated Edey minutes tonight: 13–14*.
• Isaiah Stewart and Micah Peavy are Questionable with ankle injuries.
• No confirmed minutes plan is available.

No Seed Chicago Bulls 12th Eastern Conference, 31-51 Overall, 1-0 Preseason

• PG: Josh Giddey (17.0 PPG, 9.1 APG, 24.4% USG)
• SG: Norman Powell (21.7 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 55.8% eFG) — 2025–26 Miami statistics
• SF: Matas Buzelis (16.3 PPG, 0.7 SPG, 58.6% TS)
• PF: Caleb Wilson (19.8 PPG, 9.4 RPG, N/A OREB%) — NCAA North Carolina statistics, not NBA
• C: Jalen Smith (10.2 PPG, 6.7 RPG, 0.8 BPG, 24.6% DREB)
• Key Bench: Buddy Hield (7.6 PPG, 12.8 PER), Isaac Okoro (9.3 PPG, 13.7% USG)

⸻START OUTPUT——

NBA: Memphis, Grizzlies, +124 vs Chicago, Bulls, -148 NBA Preseason Friday, October 9, 2026 Total Handle: N/A — no published preseason handle or applicable preseason default

Overall Verdict: NO PLAYS

• Model Winner: Memphis Grizzlies (54.7%)
• Projected Score: Memphis 117, Chicago 116
• Projected Total: 233.1
• Market Total: 239.5
• Best Spread Lean: Grizzlies +3.5 (-115), 64.2%
• Best Moneyline Lean: Grizzlies +124, 54.7%
• Best Total Lean: Under 239.5 (-110), 63.0%
• Decision: All three fail the model’s maximum 4-percentage-point method-sensitivity requirement.
• Model estimates are marked with * throughout. Unmarked statistics and market prices are sourced from the supplied analysis.

⸻

Game Details:

• Time: 5:00 PM PDT (8:00 PM ET)
• Location: United Center, Chicago, Illinois
• TV: NBA TV (national); DAZN Grizzlies stream (listed in team release, not independently reverified for this game)
• Event: NBA Preseason
• Memphis Preseason Record: 1-1
• Chicago Preseason Record: 1-0
• Odds Source: DraftKings, approximately 5:55 AM PDT
• Moneyline: Grizzlies +124 / Bulls -148
• Spread: Grizzlies +3.5 (-115) / Bulls -3.5 (-105)
• Total: 239.5 (-110 both sides)
• Opening Line: Chicago -3.5 (-110), Chicago ML -155 / Memphis +130

⸻

Team Lineups

RotoWire projected starting lineups for October 9, 2026. Not confirmed. Statistical averages are from the 2025–26 NBA regular season unless otherwise indicated.

No Seed Memphis Grizzlies 13th Western Conference, 25-57 Overall, 1-1 Preseason

• PG: Ty Jerome (19.7 PPG, 5.7 APG, 32.7 USG%) — 15 NBA games in 2025–26
• SG: Cedric Coward (13.6 PPG, 5.9 RPG, 54.2% eFG)
• SF: Jaylen Wells (12.5 PPG, 0.9 SPG, 55.9% TS)
• PF: Cameron Boozer (22.5 PPG, 10.2 RPG, 13.2% OREB) — NCAA Duke statistics, not NBA
• C: Zach Edey (13.6 PPG, 11.1 RPG, 1.9 BPG, 30.6% DREB) — 11 NBA games in 2025–26
• Key Bench: Jerami Grant (18.6 PPG, 15.4 PER), Cam Spencer (11.1 PPG, 17.2% USG)

Lineup Notes:

• Cameron Boozer has started both preseason games.
• Ty Jerome started both games at point guard.
• Scotty Pippen Jr. has come off the bench.
• Edey made his preseason debut October 7, playing 10 minutes.
• Estimated Edey minutes tonight: 13–14*.
• Isaiah Stewart and Micah Peavy are Questionable with ankle injuries.
• No confirmed minutes plan is available.

No Seed Chicago Bulls 12th Eastern Conference, 31-51 Overall, 1-0 Preseason

• PG: Josh Giddey (17.0 PPG, 9.1 APG, 24.4% USG)
• SG: Norman Powell (21.7 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 55.8% eFG) — 2025–26 Miami statistics
• SF: Matas Buzelis (16.3 PPG, 0.7 SPG, 58.6% TS)
• PF: Caleb Wilson (19.8 PPG, 9.4 RPG, N/A OREB%) — NCAA North Carolina statistics, not NBA
• C: Jalen Smith (10.2 PPG, 6.7 RPG, 0.8 BPG, 24.6% DREB)
• Key Bench: Buddy Hield (7.6 PPG, 12.8 PER), Isaac Okoro (9.3 PPG, 13.7% USG)

Lineup Notes:

• All five projected starters opened Chicago’s October 7 game against Phoenix.
• Caleb Wilson played 29 minutes.
• Matas Buzelis played 26 minutes.
• Josh Giddey played 23 minutes.
• Jalen Smith played 20 minutes.
• Norman Powell played 14 minutes.
• Tre Jones, Zach Collins, Nic Claxton and Jaylin Sellers are Questionable.
• Claxton’s hamstring issue reportedly keeps him out until at least his October 19 reevaluation.
• Chicago used 14 players in its preseason opener.

⸻

Team Stats Comparison

2025–26 NBA regular-season statistics. Both rosters have changed significantly.

Memphis Grizzlies

• PPG: 114.7
• RPG: 42.1
• APG: 27.8
• TPG: 14.6
• PPG Allowed: 120.7
• Offensive Efficiency: 112.4 (23rd)
• Defensive Efficiency: 118.4 (27th)
• Effective FG%: 53.3%
• FT Rate: 0.251
• Pace: 101.7 possessions (8th)
• True Team Stat: 49.3
• Formula: (114.7 + 42.1 + 27.8) − (14.6 + 120.7) = 49.3

Chicago Bulls

• PPG: 116.3
• RPG: 45.0
• APG: 28.5
• TPG: 14.6
• PPG Allowed: 121.5
• Offensive Efficiency: 112.1 (25th)
• Defensive Efficiency: 117.4 (22nd)
• Effective FG%: 54.7%
• FT Rate: 0.246
• Pace: 103.2 possessions (3rd)
• True Team Stat: 53.7
• Formula: (116.3 + 45.0 + 28.5) − (14.6 + 121.5) = 53.7

Team Statistical Advantages:

• Scoring: Chicago +1.6 PPG
• Rebounding: Chicago +2.9 RPG
• Assists: Chicago +0.7 APG
• Offensive Efficiency: Memphis +0.3
• Defensive Efficiency: Chicago +1.0 points allowed per 100 possessions
• Effective FG%: Chicago +1.4 percentage points
• Pace: Chicago +1.5 possessions
• True Team Stat: Chicago +4.4
• Relative True Team Stat Advantage: Chicago +8.9% over Memphis

⸻

True Edge Analysis:

Adjusted Net Rating Differential:

• Memphis: -3.1*
• Chicago: -2.6*
• Differential: Memphis -0.5*
• Raw 2025–26 Net Rating: Memphis -6.0 / Chicago -5.3
• Neutral-floor assessment using regressed historical ratings: teams approximately equal.
• Historical ratings are excluded from the primary margin calculation because both rosters have materially changed.

Momentum Index:

• Memphis Last 5: 1-4
• Chicago Last 5: 3-2
• Memphis Preseason: 1-1
• Chicago Preseason: 1-0
• Momentum Advantage: Chicago based on results.
• Psychological/Momentum Adjustment: N/A — April games involve substantially different rosters; no quantified emotional-momentum adjustment.
• Fatigue: No significant fatigue signal; both teams last played Wednesday, October 7.

Bench Strength Ratio:

• Memphis: 70.0* projected bench points + 13.6* minutes-weighted bench PER = 83.6*
• Chicago: 60.3* projected bench points + 10.9* minutes-weighted bench PER = 71.3*
• Memphis Advantage: +12.3* composite units
• Memphis Starting PER: 16.0*
• Chicago Starting PER: 16.0*
• Key Limitation: Chicago’s bench includes multiple rookies or players without usable NBA samples, assessed using replacement-level estimates.

Injury Adjustment Coefficient:

• Tre Jones playing 18 minutes: Memphis margin falls to +0.9*.
• Nic Claxton playing 16 minutes: Memphis margin falls to +1.2*.
• Zach Edey sitting: Memphis margin becomes +1.4*.
• Zach Edey playing 22 minutes: Memphis margin rises to +1.9*.
• Ty Jerome sitting: Memphis margin falls to +0.1*.
• Giddey and Powell both sitting: Memphis margin increases to +3.8*.
• Numerical single injury coefficient: N/A — injury impact is represented through scenario-specific margin changes.

True Edge (Final Composite % Edge):

• Memphis Grizzlies: 54.7%*
• Chicago Bulls: 45.3%*
• Memphis Probability Advantage: +9.4 percentage points*
• Neutral-Court Bottom-Up Margin: Memphis +3.5*
• Neutral-Court PER Margin: Memphis +4.9*
• Combined Neutral-Court Margin: Memphis +4.2*
• Chicago Home-Court Adjustment: +2.5 points*
• Final Memphis Margin: +1.7*

⸻

Player News:

Memphis Grizzlies

• Key Player: Cameron Boozer, No. 3 draft pick, scored 16 points in 22 minutes against Orlando on October 7.
• Key Player: Ty Jerome scored 17 points in 19 minutes on October 7.
• Key Player: Zach Edey returned October 7 with 2 points and 4 rebounds in 10 minutes.
• Injury/Update: Isaiah Stewart injured his left ankle October 5 and missed October 7.
• Injury/Update: Micah Peavy has not played this preseason because of an ankle problem.
• Minutes Update: Coach Tuomas Iisalo previously suggested most players would stay around 20 minutes, although three starters reached 22 minutes October 7.

Injuries:

• Isaiah Stewart — Questionable (left ankle)
• Micah Peavy — Questionable (ankle)
• Richie Saunders — Out (ACL, unsigned)

Chicago Bulls

• Key Player: Caleb Wilson, No. 4 draft pick, produced 15 points in 29 minutes against Phoenix.
• Key Player: Tobe Awaka posted 14 points and 11 rebounds in 21 bench minutes.
• Injury/Update: Tre Jones has hip soreness and missed the October 7 game.
• Injury/Update: Jaylin Sellers has lower-back soreness and also missed October 7.
• Injury/Update: Zach Collins reportedly is close to returning.
• Injury/Update: Nic Claxton has a hamstring injury with an October 19 reevaluation reported.
• Rotation Update: Coach Tiago Splitter used 14 players October 7; tonight’s minutes distribution is unconfirmed.

Injuries:

• Tre Jones — Questionable (hip)
• Zach Collins — Questionable (toe/soft tissue; reporting differs)
• Nic Claxton — Questionable (hamstring; reported absence through at least October 19)
• Jaylin Sellers — Questionable (lower back)

⸻

Previous Games:

Memphis Grizzlies

Last 5 Record: 1-4

• L 04/08/2026: Lost @ Denver Nuggets, 119-136 (Total: 255)
• L 04/10/2026: Lost @ Utah Jazz, 101-147 (Total: 248)
• L 04/12/2026: Lost @ Houston Rockets, 101-132 (Total: 233)
• W 10/05/2026: Won @ Atlanta Hawks, 132-123 (Total: 255)
• L 10/07/2026: Lost vs Orlando Magic, 118-122 (Total: 240)

Momentum Insight:

• Lost final three 2025–26 regular-season games.
• Entered preseason with a restructured roster and new starting players.
• Split first two preseason games.
• Both preseason totals exceeded 239 points.
• No meaningful fatigue concern.
• Emotional Bounce-Back Coefficient: N/A.

Chicago Bulls

Last 5 Record: 3-2

• W 04/07/2026: Won @ Washington Wizards, 129-98 (Total: 227)
• W 04/09/2026: Won @ Washington Wizards, 119-108 (Total: 227)
• L 04/10/2026: Lost vs Orlando Magic, 103-127 (Total: 230)
• L 04/12/2026: Lost @ Dallas Mavericks, 128-149 (Total: 277)
• W 10/07/2026: Won vs Phoenix Suns, 124-117 (Total: 241)

Momentum Insight:

• Opened preseason with a 7-point victory.
• Played at a fast pace and attempted 32 free throws against Phoenix.
• Second game in three days.
• No significant fatigue adjustment.
• Emotional Bounce-Back Coefficient: N/A.

Previous Head-to-Head:

• October 12, 2024 (Preseason): Memphis 124, Chicago 121
• 2025–26 Regular-Season Meetings: N/A — not collected.

⸻

TEAM PLAYING AT HOME:

Chicago Bulls — Yes

• Home Advantage: +2.5 points* in Chicago’s favor.
• Model’s required 5% home adjustment: Not applied separately in the supplied simulation.
• Reason: The source model already incorporates a 2.5-point home advantage and explicitly avoids a second adjustment.
• Neutral-Court Memphis Margin: +4.2*
• After Home Adjustment: Memphis +1.7*
• Final Model Win Probability: Memphis 54.7%* / Chicago 45.3%*

⸻

Game Predictions

1. Team to Win:

Memphis Grizzlies (+124) — 54.7% CF*

• Memphis projects 4.2* points better on a neutral floor.
• Chicago receives a 2.5-point* home advantage.
• Memphis’s estimated bench depth drives much of the difference.
• Historical ratings alone do not support a strong Memphis advantage.
• The model projects a one-possession game.
• Model Edge vs DraftKings ML Breakeven: +10.1 percentage points*.
• Method Sensitivity: 6.5 points*, exceeding the 4-point limit.
• Verdict: Lean Memphis — NO PLAY.

1.a ML Surprise Index (MSI):

• Team to Surprise: Memphis Grizzlies (+124)
• Model Win Probability: 54.7%*
• Market Fair Implied Probability: 42.8%
• Surprise Gap: +11.9 percentage points*
• MSI Trigger Requirement: +8 percentage points
• MSI Status: TRIGGERED
• Alternate Ratings-Included Gap: +7.5 points*
• Historical Ratings-Only Gap: -1.2 points*
• Robustness Outcome: No moneyline play.

MSI Interpretation: Memphis meets the project’s 8-point surprise threshold, but the result is sensitive to which rating method is used.

1.b Underdog Projection

Underdog: Memphis Grizzlies (+124)

• Criterion 1 — Model Win % ≥40%: Yes (54.7%*)
• Criterion 2 — Model exceeds fair implied probability by ≥8%: Yes (+11.9 points*)
• Criterion 3 — Won 3+ of last 5 or emotional momentum: No (1-4)
• Criterion 4 — Favorite has significant injury/questionable player: Yes (Tre Jones, Collins, Claxton)
• Criterion 5 — Higher True Team Stat or within 5%: No (49.3 vs 53.7)
• Criterion 6 — Better Bench Strength Ratio: Yes (83.6* vs 71.3*)
• Criterion 7 — Faster pace or favorable matchup: No (Memphis 101.7 vs Chicago 103.2; matchup criterion not independently established)

Underdog Score: 4/7

Live Dog Status: Yes

Matchup-Based Reasons:

• Memphis has the stronger modeled bench.
• Chicago may have reduced guard and center availability.
• Memphis’s bottom-up offensive outlook is favorable.
• The model favors Memphis despite Chicago’s home advantage.

Underdog Upset Risk: Elevated, but not sufficiently robust for a qualifying wager.

⸻

1.c True Score Simulation (TSS)

Simulation Configuration:

• Total Simulations: 50,000
• Random Seed: 42
• Team Scoring Standard Deviation: 12.0 points*
• Inter-Team Correlation: 0.30*
• Home Adjustment: Chicago +2.5 points*

Simulated Win Probability:

• Memphis Grizzlies: 54.7%*
• Chicago Bulls: 45.3%*

Simulated Average Score:

• Memphis Grizzlies: 117.4*
• Chicago Bulls: 115.7*

Projected Total from TSS: 233.1*

Distribution Insight:

• Memphis wins 54.7%* of 50,000 simulated games.
• Chicago wins 45.3%*.
• Probability of a finish within 3 points: 16.7%*.
• Simulation agrees with the Memphis MSI direction.

Most Common Occurrence:

• Memphis wins by 1–6 points: 16.8%* of simulations.
• Most common total band: 228–233 points (12.2%*).

TSS Interpretation: Slight Memphis advantage with substantial uncertainty and meaningful upset potential in both directions.

⸻

2. Final Score:

• Memphis Grizzlies: 117
• Chicago Bulls: 116
• Confidence: 54.7% (Memphis win probability)*
• Total: 233.1 expected points*
• Projected Winning Margin: Memphis +1.7*

Dynamic Pace Adjustment (DPA):

• DPA Triggered: No
• Memphis Pace: 101.7
• Chicago Pace: 103.2
• Neither team is below 95 possessions on the available season baseline.
• Memphis Defensive Rank: 27th
• Chicago Defensive Rank: 22nd
• Neither defense ranks in the top 10.
• No total suppression triggered.

Losing Team Output Rule (LTOR):

• Losing Team: Chicago Bulls
• Winner Confidence Bracket: 50–60%
• Projected Winning Margin: Under 5 points
• Recency/Loss Adjustment: -3% PTS/AST/USG to the losing team.
• Additional 20% Losing-Team Suppression Rule: Not separately applied in the supplied model.
• Chicago Illustrative -3% Score Adjustment: 115.7 × 0.97 = 112.2*.
• Chicago Illustrative -20% Score Adjustment: 115.7 × 0.80 = 92.6*.
• Final Score Suppression Note: The authoritative TSS score remains 117.4–115.7 because the supplied simulation already contains conditional loser suppression averaging -5.3%* for Memphis losses and -4.5%* for Chicago losses. The project’s separate 20% suppression rule is shown as an audit rather than silently recomputing all simulated outcomes or player projections.

Blowout Expansion Variable:

• Triggered: No
• Required Favorite Win Probability: Over 80%
• Current Highest Win Probability: 54.7%*

Garbage Time Pace Model:

• Triggered: No
• Market Spread: 3.5
• Required Spread: Over 15

Score Distribution Forecast

• Memphis Likely Score Range: 107–128*
• Chicago Likely Score Range: 106–126*
• Forecast Interval: 20th–80th simulation percentiles.

⸻

3. Over/Under Prediction:

• Projected Total: 233.1*
• Market Total: 239.5
• Prediction: Under 239.5 (-110)
• Confidence: 63.0%*
• Breakeven Probability: 52.4%
• Projected Value Edge: +10.6 percentage points*
• Model vs Market Difference: -6.4 points*

Total Modeling Methods:

• Regressed Team Ratings: 233.8*
• Bottom-Up Player Model: 229.4*
• Preseason Baseline: 235.9*
• Blended Total: 233.1*

Reasons Supporting Under:

• All three methods project below 239.5.
• Blended expectation is 6.4 points under the market.
• No DPA adjustment increases expected scoring.
• The game projects as a close matchup rather than a blowout.

Reasons Against Under:

• Seven of the last eight graded preseason games finished above model expectations.
• Average positive miss across those eight: +10.0 points*.
• Both Memphis preseason games exceeded 239 points.
• Chicago’s opener totaled 241.
• Across 18 graded preseason games, the model projected too low 11 times.

Robustness:

• Under 239.5 Probability Range: 59.4%–66.4%
• Failing Variations: 0
• Method Swing: 6.2 percentage points*
• Allowed Method Swing: 4 points

Verdict: Under 239.5 — NO PLAY.

⸻

4. Spread Choice:

Market Spread:

• Memphis Grizzlies +3.5 (-115)
• Chicago Bulls -3.5 (-105)
• Sportsbook: DraftKings

Recommended Lean: Memphis +3.5

• Cover Confidence: 64.2%*
• Breakeven Probability: 53.5%
• Value Edge: +10.7 percentage points*
• Robustness Range: 60.2%–70.5%
• Method Swing: 5.9 percentage points*
• Allowed Swing: 4 points
• Failing Robustness Variations: 0

Alternate Line:

• FanDuel Memphis +2.5 (-100)
• Model Cover Probability: 61.6%*
• Breakeven: 50.0%
• Edge: +11.6 percentage points*

Spread Sensitivity:

• Ratings Included: Memphis +3.5 covers 60.2%*.
• Historical Ratings Alone: 51.5%*.
• No Home Edge: 70.5%*.
• Chicago Replacement-Level Players 20% Better: 60.2%*.
• Tre Jones Plays: 62.2%*.

On Average:

• Memphis wins by 1.7* points.
• Chicago loses by 1.7* points.
• One-Possession Finish: 16.7%*.

Verdict: Memphis +3.5 — NO PLAY.

⸻

5. Total Points by Team:

Players With ≥90% Confidence: None.

Highest Point Prediction:

• Chicago Bulls: Caleb Wilson — Over 5.5 PTS, 85.0%* reported capped confidence (85.8%* raw).

The following are model-generated floor lines, not verified sportsbook props. Player point forecasts use estimated preseason minutes and prior-season scoring rates. Confidence percentages shown are supplied model estimates.

Memphis Grizzlies

• Cameron Boozer — 9.8* PTS | Over 5.5 | 80.5%*
• Ty Jerome — 12.6* PTS | Over 7.5 | 79.8%*
• Cedric Coward — 10.2* PTS | Over 5.5 | 81.3%*
• Jaylen Wells — 9.1* PTS | Over 4.5 | 82.2%*
• Jerami Grant — 11.0* PTS | Over 6.5 | 79.0%*
• Quinten Post — 6.9* PTS | Over 3.5 | 75.8%*
• Cam Spencer — 7.3* PTS | Over 3.5 | 78.8%*
• GG Jackson — 8.5* PTS | Over 4.5 | 80.0%*
• Zach Edey — 5.8* PTS | Over 2.5 | 81.4%*
• Scotty Pippen Jr. — 5.1* PTS | Over 2.5 | 75.2%*
• Walter Clayton Jr. — 4.8* PTS | Over 2.5 | 72.5%*
• Taylor Hendricks — 5.0* PTS | Over 2.5 | 72.9%*
• Olivier-Maxence Prosper — 6.3* PTS | Over 3.5 | 73.5%*
• Kris Murray — 2.4* PTS | Over 0.5 | 70.1%*

Chicago Bulls

• Caleb Wilson — 10.6* PTS | Over 5.5 | 85.0%*
• Matas Buzelis — 12.5* PTS | Over 7.5 | 79.5%*
• Josh Giddey — 11.4* PTS | Over 6.5 | 81.1%*
• Jalen Smith — 8.9* PTS | Over 4.5 | 80.9%*
• Dailyn Swain — 7.5* PTS | Over 3.5 | 82.1%*
• Norman Powell — 11.9* PTS | Over 6.5 | 82.9%*
• Tobe Awaka — 6.0* PTS | Over 3.5 | 71.7%*
• Isaac Okoro — 6.5* PTS | Over 3.5 | 74.6%*
• Buddy Hield — 8.3* PTS | Over 4.5 | 77.1%*
• Leonard Miller — 8.8* PTS | Over 4.5 | 81.1%*
• Noa Essengue — 4.9* PTS | Over 2.5 | 72.5%*
• Patrick Williams — 4.8* PTS | Over 2.5 | 72.1%*

⸻

6. REBOUNDS:

Memphis Grizzlies

• Cameron Boozer — 5.7* REB | Over 2.5 | 85.0%*
• Zach Edey — 5.2* REB | Over 2.5 | 85.0%*
• Cedric Coward — 4.6* REB | Over 2.5 | 81.7%*
• Quinten Post — 3.5* REB | Over 1.5 | 84.2%*
• GG Jackson — 2.8* REB | Over 1.5 | 74.9%*
• Jaylen Wells — 2.4* REB | Over 0.5 | 85.0%*

Chicago Bulls

• Caleb Wilson — 6.7* REB | Over 3.5 | 85.0%*
• Jalen Smith — 6.2* REB | Over 3.5 | 83.9%*
• Josh Giddey — 5.9* REB | Over 3.5 | 81.6%*
• Matas Buzelis — 4.7* REB | Over 2.5 | 82.9%*
• Leonard Miller — 3.7* REB | Over 1.5 | 85.0%*
• Dailyn Swain — 2.7* REB | Over 1.5 | 73.0%*

⸻

7. ASSISTS:

Memphis Grizzlies

• Ty Jerome — 4.2* AST | Over 2.5 | 76.2%*
• Cam Spencer — 3.5* AST | Over 1.5 | 84.3%*
• Walter Clayton Jr. — 2.3* AST | Over 0.5 | 85.0%*
• Cedric Coward — 2.2* AST | Over 0.5 | 85.0%*
• Cameron Boozer — 2.1* AST | Over 0.5 | 85.0%*
• Javon Small — 1.4* AST | Over 0.5 | 73.4%*

Chicago Bulls

• Josh Giddey — 6.6* AST | Over 3.5 | 85.0%*
• Caleb Wilson — 1.8* AST | Over 0.5 | 82.0%*
• Matas Buzelis — 1.7* AST | Over 0.5 | 81.3%*
• Norman Powell — 1.4* AST | Over 0.5 | 75.5%*
• Tre Jones — 1.4* AST | Over 0.5 | 38.3%*
• Buddy Hield — 1.3* AST | Over 0.5 | 71.3%*

⸻

8. 3 POINTERS (Reduce by 40%):

3PT projections are reduced by approximately 40% from their raw baselines. Confidence reflects the probability of at least one made three-pointer at the reduced rate.

Memphis Grizzlies

• Ty Jerome — 1.1* 3PT (Raw 1.8*) | 65.3%*
• Jerami Grant — 0.8* 3PT (Raw 1.4*) | 56.6%*
• Jaylen Wells — 0.8* 3PT (Raw 1.4*) | 55.2%*
• Cam Spencer — 0.8* 3PT (Raw 1.3*) | 53.4%*
• Quinten Post — 0.8* 3PT (Raw 1.3*) | 52.4%*
• Cedric Coward — 0.7* 3PT (Raw 1.1*) | 48.4%*

Chicago Bulls

• Matas Buzelis — 1.0* 3PT (Raw 1.7*) | 63.2%*
• Buddy Hield — 1.0* 3PT (Raw 1.6*) | 61.4%*
• Norman Powell — 0.9* 3PT (Raw 1.5*) | 57.8%*
• Jalen Smith — 0.8* 3PT (Raw 1.3*) | 53.6%*
• Josh Giddey — 0.8* 3PT (Raw 1.3*) | 53.1%*
• Patrick Williams — 0.5* 3PT (Raw 0.9*) | 41.0%*

⸻

9. BLOCKS:

Memphis Grizzlies

• Zach Edey — 0.9* BLK | 1+ Block: 60.7%*
• GG Jackson — 0.5* BLK | 1+ Block: 39.8%*
• Quinten Post — 0.4* BLK | 1+ Block: 34.3%*
• Isaiah Stewart — 0.4* BLK | 1+ Block: 25.7%*

Chicago Bulls

• Matas Buzelis — 1.2* BLK | 1+ Block: 70.1%*
• Jalen Smith — 0.7* BLK | 1+ Block: 51.7%*
• Caleb Wilson — 0.7* BLK | 1+ Block: 51.2%*
• Josh Giddey — 0.4* BLK | 1+ Block: 29.5%*

⸻

10. STEALS:

Memphis Grizzlies

• Scotty Pippen Jr. — 1.2* STL | 1+ Steal: 67.5%*
• Ty Jerome — 1.0* STL | 1+ Steal: 62.2%*
• Cameron Boozer — 0.7* STL | 1+ Steal: 49.9%*
• Jaylen Wells — 0.7* STL | 1+ Steal: 49.1%*

Chicago Bulls

• Caleb Wilson — 1.0* STL | 1+ Steal: 60.8%*
• Buddy Hield — 0.7* STL | 1+ Steal: 50.9%*
• Josh Giddey — 0.7* STL | 1+ Steal: 50.3%*
• Norman Powell — 0.6* STL | 1+ Steal: 46.5%*

⸻

PLAYER BREAKOUT:

20-Minute Playing-Time Baseline

• All listed projections are normalized to approximately 20 minutes.
• Model floors are provided for points, rebounds, assists and PRA.
• BRI Formula: Ceiling = Base × (1 + 0.08V + 0.07R + 0.09F + 0.06M).
• BRI Yes: At least 2 factors and ceiling expansion ≥18%.
• BRI Soft: At least 2 factors and ceiling expansion from 10% to under 18%.
• Preseason L5 data is unavailable; under the project override, V=0 and F=0.
• R=0 where minutes/touch trends are not established.
• M=1 because the posted total is 239.5, above the 228 threshold.

Memphis Grizzlies

Cameron Boozer

• Points: 9.4*
• Points Floor: Over 5.5
• Rebounds: 5.5*
• Rebounds Floor: Over 2.5
• PRA: 16.9*
• PRA Floor: Over 9.5
• Confidence: 85.0%*
• BRI Factors: V0 / R0 / F0 / M1
• Ceiling Multiplier: 1.06
• Ceiling Points: 9.9*
• BRI: NO

Ty Jerome

• Points: 12.6*
• Points Floor: Over 7.5
• Assists: 4.2*
• Assists Floor: Over 2.5
• PRA: 19.1*
• PRA Floor: Over 10.5
• Confidence: 85.0%*
• BRI Factors: V0 / R0 / F0 / M1
• Ceiling Multiplier: 1.06
• Ceiling Points: 13.3*
• BRI: NO

Zach Edey

• Points: 9.1*
• Points Floor: Over 4.5
• Rebounds: 8.1*
• Rebounds Floor: Over 4.5
• PRA: 18.1*
• PRA Floor: Over 10.5
• Confidence: 85.0%*
• BRI Factors: V0 / R0 / F0 / M1
• Ceiling Multiplier: 1.06
• Ceiling Points: 9.6*
• BRI: NO

Chicago Bulls

Caleb Wilson

• Points: 8.6*
• Points Floor: Over 4.5
• Rebounds: 5.4*
• Rebounds Floor: Over 2.5
• PRA: 15.4*
• PRA Floor: Over 8.5
• Confidence: 85.0%*
• BRI Factors: V0 / R0 / F0 / M1
• Ceiling Multiplier: 1.06
• Ceiling Points: 9.1*
• BRI: NO

Norman Powell

• Points: 13.8*
• Points Floor: Over 7.5
• Rebounds: 2.3*
• Rebounds Floor: Over 0.5
• PRA: 17.8*
• PRA Floor: Over 10.5
• Confidence: 85.0%*
• BRI Factors: V0 / R0 / F0 / M1
• Ceiling Multiplier: 1.06
• Ceiling Points: 14.6*
• BRI: NO

Josh Giddey

• Points: 10.0*
• Points Floor: Over 5.5
• Assists: 5.7*
• Assists Floor: Over 2.5
• PRA: 20.8*
• PRA Floor: Over 11.5
• Confidence: 85.0%*
• BRI Factors: V0 / R0 / F0 / M1
• Ceiling Multiplier: 1.06
• Ceiling Points: 10.6*
• BRI: NO

BRI Summary:

• Players Screened in Source Engine: 33
• Players Meeting BRI Yes: 0
• Players Meeting BRI Soft: 0
• Players Meeting BRI No: 33
• M-Flag Active: 33
• Tier Changes When M Removed: 0
• Conclusion: No qualifying breakout.
• Recency Limitation: No complete five-game 2026 sample; project V/F override applies.

⸻

SPORTSBOOK LIABILITY SNAPSHOT:

DraftKings Betting Splits: N/A

• No DraftKings Network preseason splits were available in the supplied analysis.
• No estimated DraftKings splits are used.
• Estimated Actual Handle: N/A.

ScoresAndOdds Unnamed Betting Panel:

Moneyline:

• Chicago Bulls Tickets: 70%
• Chicago Bulls Money: 48%
• Memphis Grizzlies Tickets: 30%
• Memphis Grizzlies Money: 52%

Spread:

• Chicago Bulls Tickets: 57%
• Chicago Bulls Money: 59%
• Memphis Grizzlies Tickets: 43%
• Memphis Grizzlies Money: 41%

Total:

• Over Tickets: 79%
• Over Money: 83%
• Under Tickets: 21%
• Under Money: 17%

Highest Risk to Sportsbooks:

• Market: Over 239.5
• Reason: Largest observed one-sided ticket and money concentration.
• Public Position: Strongly Over.
• Model Position: Under 239.5, 63.0%*.
• Potential Book Liability: N/A — no dollar handle or payout exposure available.

Sportsbook Best Outcome:

• Under 239.5
• Reason: The unnamed panel shows 83% of money on the Over.
• Secondary Favorable Outcome: N/A — spread and moneyline money is more balanced.

Liability Caution: This panel does not identify DraftKings or represent verified market-wide liability.

⸻

Insights:

Memphis Strengths:

• Bench depth with returning NBA experience.
• Jerami Grant, Cam Spencer, GG Jackson, Quinten Post and Scotty Pippen Jr. contribute to the projected rotation.
• Estimated Bench Strength Ratio of 83.6*.
• PER-adjusted bench advantage over Chicago.
• Favorable bottom-up neutral-court scoring projection.

Memphis Weaknesses:

• 25-57 record last season.
• Ranked 27th in defensive efficiency.
• Zach Edey is returning on limited playing time.
• Cameron Boozer has limited NBA experience.
• Offensive projections rely partly on small samples and translated college performance.

Chicago Strengths:

• Third-fastest 2025–26 pace.
• Starting five has already played together.
• Giddey creates passing and rebounding opportunities.
• Caleb Wilson played 29 minutes in the opener.
• Home-court advantage.

Chicago Weaknesses:

• Multiple questionable guards and big men.
• Bench includes several players without usable NBA performance histories.
• Replacement-level assumptions may underrate Chicago’s reserves.
• 22nd-ranked 2025–26 defense.

Adjusted Advantage:

• Memphis Model Win Probability: 54.7%*
• Chicago Model Win Probability: 45.3%*
• Memphis Probability Advantage: +9.4 percentage points*
• Neutral-Court Margin Advantage: Memphis +4.2*
• Home-Adjusted Margin Advantage: Memphis +1.7*

Important Model Risk:

• If Chicago’s unrated bench players perform 20% better than replacement-level assumptions, Memphis +3.5 falls from 64.2%* to 60.2%*.
• If historical ratings alone determine the winner, Memphis’s estimated win probability falls to 41.6%*.

⸻

Edge Summary:

DraftKings Fair Market Probabilities (Devigged):

Moneyline:

• Memphis: 42.8%
• Chicago: 57.2%
• Vig: 4.32%

Spread:

• Memphis +3.5: 51.1%
• Chicago -3.5: 48.9%
• Vig: 4.71%

Total:

• Over 239.5: 50.0%
• Under 239.5: 50.0%
• Vig: 4.76%

Market Value Analysis

Memphis +3.5 (-115)

• Model: 64.2%*
• Breakeven: 53.5%
• Edge: +10.7 points*
• Robustness Range: 60.2%–70.5%
• Failing Variations: 0
• Method Swing: 5.9 points*
• Status: NO PLAY

Memphis ML (+124)

• Model: 54.7%*
• Breakeven: 44.6%
• Edge: +10.1 points*
• Robustness Range: 50.3%–61.6%
• Failing Variations: 0
• Method Swing: 6.5 points*
• Best Observed Price: BetRivers +128
• Status: NO PLAY

Under 239.5 (-110)

• Model: 63.0%*
• Breakeven: 52.4%
• Edge: +10.6 points*
• Robustness Range: 59.4%–66.4%
• Failing Variations: 0
• Method Swing: 6.2 points*
• Status: NO PLAY

Chicago -3.5 (-105)

• Model: 35.8%*
• Breakeven: 51.2%
• Edge: -15.4 points*
• Status: NO PLAY

Chicago ML (-148)

• Model: 45.3%*
• Breakeven: 59.7%
• Edge: -14.4 points*
• Status: NO PLAY

Decision Requirements

• Minimum Edge: +5 percentage points over breakeven
• Failing Robustness Variations: 0
• Maximum Method Swing: 4 percentage points

Final Betting Decision: NO QUALIFYING EDGE

All three positive-edge candidates exceed the allowed method sensitivity.

Market vs Model Margin:

• Market: Chicago by 3.5
• Model: Memphis by 1.7*
• Difference: 5.2 points*
• Single-Game Margin Standard Deviation: Approximately 14 points*

Adverse Scenario:

• Memphis starters play 16 minutes.
• Chicago starters play 26 minutes.
• Tre Jones plays.
• Historical team ratings are included.
• Memphis +3.5 Cover Probability: 56.5%*.
• Memphis ML Win Probability: 46.6%*.

⸻

99.99% Parlay:

All alternate lines and player floors are model references, not verified available sportsbook markets. No 99.99%-confidence parlay was established.

Step 1: Five-Leg High-Confidence Parlay

• Memphis Grizzlies +10.5 — 80.4%*
• Over 216.5 Total — 80.4%*
• Under 249.5 Total — 80.0%*
• Ty Jerome Over 6.5 Points — 85.2%*
• Josh Giddey Over 6.5 Points — 81.1%*

Overall Confidence:

• Correlation-Aware Joint Probability: 33.4%*
• Naive Independent Probability: 35.7%*
• Correlation Adjustment: -2.3 percentage points*
• Fair Odds: Approximately +199*
• 99.99% Achieved: No
• Status: NO PLAY

Step 2: Higher-Confidence Adjustment

Same Core Market Types, Reduced to Three Legs

• Memphis Grizzlies +22.5 — 95.5%*
• Over 200.5 Total — 95.2%*
• Cameron Boozer Over 7.5 PRA — 96.8%*

Overall Confidence:

• Correlation-Aware Joint Probability: 88.1%*
• Naive Independent Probability: 88.1%*
• Correlation Adjustment: +0.0 percentage points*
• Fair Odds: Approximately -743*
• 99.99% Achieved: No
• Status: NO PLAY

Parlay Risk Assessment:

• Five-Leg Parlay Failure Probability: 66.6%*.
• Three-Leg Parlay Failure Probability: 11.9%*.
• The original five legs were not all retained in Step 2; the source switches to a three-leg construction.
• No evidence supports presenting either construction as 99.99% reliable.

⸻

FINAL THOUGHTS RAW:

ML:

Memphis Grizzlies (+124) — 54.7%*

• Market Fair Win Probability: 42.8%
• MSI: Triggered (+11.9 percentage points*)
• Underdog Score: 4/7
• Live Underdog: Yes
• Betting Status: NO PLAY

Note — Underdog Win Path:

• Memphis wins through stronger bench contributions, efficient offensive rotations and possible Chicago lineup absences.
• This matchup is close to a coin flip, with the model holding only a modest 54.7% advantage.
• If Tre Jones plays, Memphis falls to 52.5%*.
• If Edey plays 22 minutes, Memphis rises to 55.3%*.
• If Edey sits, Memphis falls to 53.8%*.
• Historical ratings alone favor Chicago, leaving Memphis at 41.6%*.
• Biggest uncertainty: Chicago’s unrated reserves and preseason minutes distribution.

Spread: Top 5

• Memphis +8.0 — 65.0%* (capped; raw 75.1%)
• Memphis +6.5 — 65.0%* (capped; raw 71.7%)
• Memphis +5.0 — 65.0%* (capped; raw 68.2%)
• Memphis +3.5 — 64.2%*
• Memphis +2.0 — 60.4%*

Primary Spread: Memphis +3.5 (-115), 64.2%* — NO PLAY

Total Score: Top 5 Over/Under

• Under 245.5 — 65.0%* (capped; raw 73.9%)
• Under 243.5 — 65.0%* (capped; raw 70.5%)
• Under 241.5 — 65.0%* (capped; raw 66.9%)
• Under 239.5 — 63.0%*
• Under 237.5 — 59.2%*

Primary Total: Under 239.5 (-110), 63.0%* — NO PLAY

Points: Top 5

• Caleb Wilson Over 5.5 — 85.0%* (raw 85.8%)
• Norman Powell Over 6.5 — 82.9%*
• Jaylen Wells Over 4.5 — 82.2%*
• Cedric Coward Over 5.5 — 81.3%*
• Leonard Miller Over 4.5 — 81.1%*

Rebounds: Top 5

• Cameron Boozer Over 2.5 — 85.0%* (raw 90.8%)
• Caleb Wilson Over 3.5 — 85.0%* (raw 88.1%)
• Zach Edey Over 2.5 — 85.0%* (raw 87.0%)
• Leonard Miller Over 1.5 — 85.0%* (raw 86.7%)
• Quinten Post Over 1.5 — 84.2%*

Assists: Top 3

• Josh Giddey Over 3.5 — 85.0%* (raw 86.0%)
• Cam Spencer Over 1.5 — 84.3%*
• Ty Jerome Over 2.5 — 76.2%*

PRA: Top 5

• Josh Giddey Over 13.5 — 85.0%* (raw 92.6%)
• Caleb Wilson Over 10.5 — 85.0%* (raw 92.6%)
• Ty Jerome Over 10.5 — 85.0%* (raw 90.2%)
• Matas Buzelis Over 10.5 — 85.0%* (raw 89.9%)
• Cedric Coward Over 9.5 — 85.0%* (raw 89.1%)

Double Double:

• Josh Giddey — No
• Probability of Double Double: 16.2%*
• Probability of No Double Double: 83.8%*
• Next Most Likely: Caleb Wilson (10.6%* double-double probability)

⸻

FINAL RANKED BETTING LEANS

1. Memphis Grizzlies +3.5 (-115)

• Confidence: 64.2%*
• Edge: +10.7 points*
• Method Swing: 5.9 points*
• Risk: Chicago’s replacement-level bench assumptions may understate its actual performance.
• Decision: NO PLAY

2. Memphis Grizzlies ML (+124 DraftKings / +128 BetRivers)

• Confidence: 54.7%*
• Edge at DraftKings: +10.1 points*
• Method Swing: 6.5 points*
• Risk: Model’s roster-adjusted projections strongly disagree with historical ratings.
• Decision: NO PLAY

3. Under 239.5 (-110)

• Confidence: 63.0%*
• Edge: +10.6 points*
• Method Swing: 6.2 points*
• Risk: Preseason scoring has consistently exceeded recent model estimates.
• Decision: NO PLAY

Final Model Summary:

• Moneyline: Memphis Grizzlies 54.7%*
• Spread: Memphis +3.5 64.2%*
• Total: Under 239.5 63.0%*
• Projected Final Score: Memphis 117, Chicago 116
• Most Significant Risk: Preseason uncertainty, especially Chicago’s bench production.
• Overall Recommendation: NO PLAYS

⸻

DATA SOURCING & MODEL VALIDATION

Data Validation Gates:

• G1: PASS — matchup/date/venue verified through the supplied RotoWire, ScoresAndOdds and ESPN records.
• G2: PASS — projected lineups available, not confirmed.
• G3: PASS — projected total 233.1* vs market 239.5; difference 6.4 points* within the 12-point guardrail.
• G4: PASS — moneyline lean agrees with simulated margin.
• G5: PASS — sportsbook splits not fabricated.
• G6: PASS — observed DraftKings two-way markets devigged.
• G7: PASS — side/total confidence capped at 65%, prop confidence capped at 85%.
• G8: PASS — historical results graded and new tracking entries reported.

Model Parameters:

• Simulation Runs: 50,000
• Random Seed: 42
• Team Score SD: 12.0*
• Correlation: 0.30*
• Home-Court Value: +2.5 points*
• Points Per Possession: 1.123
• Usage-Efficiency Elasticity: 0.20
• Defensive Multiplier: 0.60
• Preseason Adjustment: 0.984

Recency-Weighted Player Adjustment:

• Last 5 Games: 45%
• Games 4–5: 35%
• Full Season: 20%
• Full 2026 Preseason Sample: N/A.
• Applied Alternative: 2025–26 baseline with low-sample shrinkage, translated NCAA statistics for rookies and preseason minutes assumptions.
• Fully Compliant Recency Calculation: N/A — insufficient current-season games.

Source Model Components:

• Historical Regressed Ratings Total: 233.8*
• Bottom-Up Player Total: 229.4*
• Preseason Baseline Total: 235.9*
• Blended Total: 233.1*
• Bottom-Up Neutral Margin: Memphis +3.5*
• PER Neutral Margin: Memphis +4.9*
• Historical Ratings Neutral Margin: Chicago +0.5*
• Primary Margin: Mean of Bottom-Up and PER, adjusted for home court.

Robustness Tests:

• Variations Evaluated: 36
• Additional Reference Scenarios: 3
• Grizzlies +3.5 Probability Range: 60.2%–70.5%
• Grizzlies ML Probability Range: 50.3%–61.6%
• Under 239.5 Probability Range: 59.4%–66.4%
• Minimum Qualifying Edge: +5 percentage points
• Maximum Method Swing: 4 percentage points
• Qualifying Plays: 0

Historical Ledger:

• October 8 Graded Tracking Rows: 12
• Result: 7-5
• Prior Played Record: 18-11, +3.57 units
• Updated Played Record: 20-11 counting both Nets wagers
• Updated Record by Distinct Position: 19-11
• Tracked No-Play Record: 31-23
• October 9 New Tracking Entries: 3 (IDs 79–81)
• Status: All three NO PLAY

Quality Checks:

• Engine Self-Test: PASS (6/6)
• Automated Mutation Testing: PASS (46/46 deliberate errors detected)
• Independent Reviewer: N/A — not executed
• Kings–Lakers October 8 Final: N/A — pending in supplied ledger

Primary Information Sources in Supplied Analysis:

• RotoWire — projected lineups and injuries
• ScoresAndOdds — sportsbook lines and betting splits
• ESPN — matchup and scoreboard feed
• NBA Game Books — preseason appearances and minutes
• StatMuse, RealGM, ESPN — 2025–26 player statistics
• NBC Sports/Rotoworld, CBS Sports, ClutchPoints, SI and other cited outlets — player availability and coaching reports

Data Limitations:

• Verified Player Prop Lines: N/A
• Confirmed Starting Lineups: N/A
• Confirmed Minutes Restrictions: N/A
• Actual Sportsbook Handle: N/A
• DraftKings Preseason Betting Splits: N/A
• Complete Recency-Weighted L5 Player Data: N/A
• Reliable Chicago Bench Player NBA Samples: Partially unavailable
• Confirmed 99.99% Parlay: N/A

⸻

-END OUTPUT-